Types of Business Change
Change is a complex phenomenon. There are different types of changes that are going on around us. Listed in this article are twelve areas in which change arises and bring some classification to it. However one may classify the change, the various heading is always interrelated. The change could be triggered by market changes, technological changes, or organizational changes.
There are several models of organizational change. A model is an integrated way of explaining why and how change takes place, based on a known and acceptable basic explanation (theory) of relationships of several aspects involved. It would be obvious that there can be different ways of explaining the change, depending on what theory we follow or use.
1. Trickle-Down Model
Two contrasting models of change are the "trickle-down" model vs. "identity search" model. In the trickle-down models of change, the change is driven by the elite group. The organizational change occurs because the top management takes a decision and adopts some new ways (technology, systems, structure, etc.) and others follow it.
2. Identity Search Model
According to the Identify Search Model, the urge to develop one's own uniqueness and identity will make the group or individuals accept change.
3. Internal Change
Another way is to look at change is to look for the external or internal forces as determinants of changes. Change can be a result of internal factors like changes in the direction and objectives and ideology of a company or a workforce.
4. External Change
The changes, which occur within the business, can result from external environments such as the development of technology, globalization of markets, or new competitors on the market.
5. Adaptation Model
Business models change as managers engage in more mundane adaptation in response to external changes. The adaptation model emphasizes the role of external factors (for example a new government policy, or competitive environment) in producing a change in organizations (more emphasis on quality, restructuring, etc.). To respond positively to environmental changes, the person must adapt.
6. Proactive Model of Change
According to the proactive model, the explanation comes from within the organization (the decision of the organization to set an example, to be a leader, to anticipate the future) and act and change itself in response to such an internal urge. Companies that take a proactive approach to change are often trying to avoid a potential future threat or to capitalize on a potential future opportunity. Corrective action was being taken before a market decline or before technology became obsolete. Positive action was being taken to seize competitive advantage before someone else did.
7. Structural Model of Change
Yet another explanation of organizational change may lie in the emphasis on the structure or the process. Structural change refers to a dramatic shift in the way a country, industry, or market operates. Successful change, according to the structure model, would require preparing the necessary structural details (technology, design of the organization, systems), and introduce them systematically.
8. Process Model of Change
The process of change entails creating the perception that a change is needed, then moving toward the new, desired level of behavior and, finally, solidifying that new behavior as the norm. People will also change, according to the process model, successful change can be planned by helping people to develop process competencies (ways of planning, decision-making, problem-solving, collaborating, communicating, etc.), and then people will find new ways of organizing, etc.
9. Adaptive Change
Adaptive change requires new learning for problem definition and solution implementation. Adaptive change requires auditing of existing systems, roles, and responsibilities. This process can often result in essentially rebuilding the entire company by redefining job descriptions, consolidation, elimination of overlap, and creating greater efficiencies. This involves the reimplementation of a change in the same organizational unit. Adaptive change is not considered threatening.
10. Innovative Change
An organization needs to constantly innovate to succeed. Innovation is about making things better, faster, or cheaper. Dynamically continuous innovation affects the way in which the company adapts to changing market conditions. This involves changes that are generally new and unfamiliar. The innovative changes create a kind of uncertainty and fear in organizations.
11. Radically Innovative Change
Radical innovation is an invention that destroys or supplants an existing business model. Radical innovation is the long-term growth strategy for revolutionary business transformation. The concept of radical innovation is about leveraging core competencies for the future and this is the most intimidating type of change. This type of change is most resisted in organizations. Radical innovation creates such a dramatic change in processes, products, or services that they transform existing markets or industries, or create new ones. Implementation of a radical change in an organization requires a long-term strategy.
12. Reactive Change
This is a change brought about by a sudden or unplanned event. Whereas the planned change is a systematic, deliberate change in the way part or all of an organization functions. In planned change the focus is on processes, people, or technology; and one person, a project team, a department, or the entire firm can be involved in the change process.
Related Links
You May Also Like
-
Stress is an essential part of our life. No one can live without stress. Stress can be beneficial as well as harmful. Stress as a positive influence adds excitement and hope while as a negative influence it can result in destructive feelings, anger, and depression. Although the general orientation to stress is to consider unfavorable outcomes, yet one must have observed that stress experiences may also facilitate the development of effective and varied coping behavior, increased personal resources, and lead to a sense of competence in development. Stress at a moderate level is not only inevitable but may be useful for physical and mental well-being.
-
Four main areas in an organization that need special focus when we discuss the change in an organizational setup are organizational structure, technology, work environment, and the people. Some people call it a process, system, and people. Change in an organization includes adapting to change, controlling change, and effecting change.
-
Team Foundation in Forming Stage
This is the first stage of team development. This is the stage when the foundation of the team is laid. During the Forming stage, team members have a high dependence on their leader for guidance. Learn the practical strategies you can use during this stage to help your team develop into a highly effective performing team.
-
Creating Highly Effective Teams
How do we create effective teams? What comes to mind when you think about an effective team? High performing teams exhibit accountability, purpose, cohesiveness, and collaboration. It is a team that works seamlessly as a whole. Everyone brings unique talents and strengths and support each other to bring out the best in everyone. How do you create one?
-
As we know change is inevitable as market expectations are not static, new technology is constantly being developed, and organizational responses are inevitable to these sequences. It is a simple matter of business evolution. If every manager and every employee could have some understanding of the triggers of change and their relationships with each other, then the acceptance to change would be easier.
-
Benefits of Teams in Workplace
The use of formal work teams is commonplace in modern organizations. But why we have teams? What are the benefits or advantages that teams provide for organizations and employees? Do we really need to adopt formal team structures and use team-building approaches in organizations? Read this article to explore and learn the benefits of having formal teams in organizations.
-
Facilitative Leadership is all about involving the employees in the decision-making process at all levels enhancing their sense of ownership, responsibility, and motivation. Facilitative leadership style uses a number of indirect communication patterns to help the group reach consensus and build commitment for the decision taken. To be effective in modern organizations, managers need to become facilitative leaders, learn what it means to be a one.
-
A good leadership style is something that every effective leader must have in order to succeed, but identifying what that entails or does not entails might be difficult to understand. Most of the research on leadership focuses on the exemplary, best practices, and positive attributes of effective and successful leaders. This article talks about a new approach to learn leadership using lessons from bad leadership. That is the lessons to be learned by examining leaders who have not effectively exercised their power, authority, or influence.
-
Collaborative leadership is all about collaborative problem-solving and decision-making or can also be defined as the leadership of a collaborative effort. . The term started to appear in the mid-1990s in response to the formation of long term public-private partnerships to rebuild public infrastructure. Learn how you can use principles of collaborative leadership to enhance your leadership skills for being an effective leader.
-
Reasons behind Wastage of Time
Under-utilization of time may be due to the faulty system or faults of manager/officer/leader or due to lack of planning. There could be many factors driving the procrastination behavior like system issues, personal work habits, and lack of delegation, personality traits, and bad working habits of the leader, failure to tackle interpersonal conflicts, obstacles, and lack of far-sightedness.
