McGregor's Theory X and Theory Y

McGregor's Theory X and Theory Y

McGregor created Theory X and Theory Y of human work motivation and explained two styles of management known as authoritarian (Theory X) and participative (Theory Y). Theory X management assumes most people will attempt to avoid work whereas Theory Y managers trust their people to take ownership of their work.

About McGregor:

Douglas Murray McGregor (1906 – 1 October 1964) was a Management professor at the MIT Sloan School of Management and president of Antioch College from 1948 to 1954. McGregor was born in Detroit. He earned a B.E. (Mechanical) from Rangoon Institute of Technology, an A.B. from Wayne State University in 1932, and then earned an M.A. and Ph.D. in psychology from Harvard University in 1944 and 1955 respectively. His 1960 book “The Human Side of Enterprise” had a profound influence on education practices.  In the book The Human Side of Enterprise, McGregor identified an approach of creating an environment within which employees are motivated via authoritative, direction and control or integration and self-control, which he called theory X and theory Y, respectively.

McGregor (1960) categorized leadership styles into two broad categories having two different beliefs and assumptions about subordinates. He called these Theory X and Theory Y.

What are Theory X and Theory Y?

This theory is an attempt to understand what actually motivates employees to go to work each day and whether people like to be independent and work hard themselves or they always need a leader to control and guide them. Whether people get great satisfaction from their work and they are proud of it or view it as a burden, and they just work as they need to work to survive. This theory tries to study this question of motivation to identify successful approaches to management.

Social psychologist Douglas McGregor developed two divergent theories on human motivation and called them as The X Theory and the Theory Y. One theory assumes that most people like working and the other contrasts that most dislike working. The management style of any manager will be strongly influenced by his beliefs and assumptions about what he thinks are the drivers of motivation for the team. If the manager believes that they dislike work, he might tend to adopt authoritarian style of management whereas the leader who assumes that employees like working will tend to adopt democratic style.

What is Theory X?

THeoryXTheory X assumes that employees are naturally unmotivated and dislike working. As a result the Theory X style of leaders believes that most people dislike work and will avoid it wherever possible. Such leaders feel they themselves are a small but important group, who want to lead and take responsibility, but a large majority of people want to be directed and avoid responsibility. Therefore, this style of leadership exercises strong controls and direction and wherever necessary punish people if they do not do the work and this encourages an authoritarian style of management. If people do the work as desired, they may even get monetary or other rewards. According to this view, management must actively intervene to get things done.

This style of management assumes that workers:

  • Dislike working.
  • Avoid responsibility
  • Need constant supervision
  • Need to be directed.
  • Need to be controlled
  • Need to be forced to deliver
  • Need controls put in place
  • Need to be induced to produce results
  • Need incentives to work.
  • Cannot delegate

What is Theory Y?

TheoryYIt assumes that employees are self-motivated, like working, self-motivated and take pride in getting greater responsibility. As a result, Theory Y leaders assume that people will work hard and assume responsibility if they can satisfy their personal needs and the objectives or goals of their organization. Such leaders do not sharply distinguish between the leaders and the followers in contrast to Theory X style. They feel that people control themselves within rather than being controlled by others from outside such as a leader or a manager or a supervisor. Theory Y explicates a participative style of management that is de-centralized. In Y-Type organizations, people at lower levels of the organization are involved in decision making and have more responsibility.

This style of management assumes that workers:

  • Like working
  • Takes responsibility
  • Are self-motivated
  • Are self-driven to accomplish organizational goals
  • Seek greater responsibility
  • Are self-directed
  • Need fewer or no controls
  • Does not need much direction
  • Are creative
  • Solve work problems imaginatively

Comparing Theory X and Theory Y:

An effective leader needs to examine carefully their own ideas about the motivation and behavior of subordinates and others, as well as the situation, before adopting a particular style of leadership. Given below is a table explaining the contrast between Theory X and Theory Y.

Attribute

Theory X

Theory Y

Motivation

Dislike Work

Self-Motivated

Responsibility

Avoid Responsibility

Enjoy Greater Responsibility

Management

Authoritarian

Democratic / Participative

Control

Centralized

De-Centralized

Decision Making

Management Decides

Jointly Decision Making Happens

Skills

Repetitive Work

Specialized Work

Training

Skills Driven

Competency Driven

Awards

Based on Performance

Based on Performance and Values

Delegation

Not Possible

Delegation Happens

Delivery

Forced to Perform

Self-driven Delivery

Change

Resist Change

Adapts to Change

Direction

Formal Directions

Self-Driven

Implications of Theory X and Theory Y:

Theory X and Theory Y relates to Maslow's hierarchy of needs in how human behavior and motivation is the main priority in the workplace in order to maximize output. In relations to Theory Y the organization is trying to create the most symbiotic relationship between the managers and workers which relates to Maslow's hierarchy of needs of Self Actualization and Esteem. For Self Actualization the manager needs to promote the optimum workplace through morality, creativity, spontaneity, problem solving, lack of prejudice, and acceptance of facts. It can relate to esteem when the manager is trying to promote self-esteem, confidence, achievement, respect of others, and respect by others.

Very few organizations use Theory X techniques. Theory X encourages use of tight control and supervision and takes a pessimistic view of employees. It implies that employees are reluctant to organizational changes. Thus, it does not encourage innovation and encourages an authoritarian style of management. Many organizations use Theory Y techniques. Theory Y encourages decentralization of authority, teamwork and participative decision making in an organization. It tries to harmonize and match employees’ needs and aspirations with organizational needs and aspirations. 

Related Links

You May Also Like

  • Transactional Analysis

    Transactional Analysis

    Transactional Analysis also is known as the theory of human personality was proposed by Eric Berne in the 1950s. This theory of transactional leadership defines three different ego states in a person who engages in transactions with another person's ego states. These three ego states refer to major parts of an individual's personality and reflect an entire system of thought, feeling, and behavior.

  • Humanistic theories of Leadership

    Humanistic theories of Leadership

    Humanistic leadership is an ethical philosophic approach that recognizes the dignity and worth of each and every group or team member. This approach is based on building a leadership culture of trust, ethics, and empathy. Humanistic leadership is a set of principles founded on humanism with vision, mission, values, and expected behaviors. It is value-driven leadership based on principles such as humility, accountability, positivity, and love.

  • Leadership Substitute Theory

    Leadership Substitute Theory

    Substitutes for leadership theory is based on understanding the context within which leadership occurs. Different situational factors can enhance, neutralize, or substitute for leader behaviors like under certain circumstances, situational factors may substitute for leadership. These substitutes are of two types - substitutes and neutralizers. Substitutes take away from the leader's power and help group members increase their performance. Neutralizers only remove influence from the leader.

  • Ohio State Studies

    Ohio State Studies

    Early studies on leadership were done at Ohio State University using the Leader Behavior Description Questionnaire to identify the leader's observable behaviors. Ohio State study on leadership found two behavioral characteristics of leadership - people-oriented (consideration) and task-oriented (initiating structure) leadership style.

  • McClelland's Theory of Needs

    McClelland's Theory of Needs

    McClelland's Theory of Needs is a human motivation theory which states that an individual's specific needs are acquired over time through our culture and life experiences. As per the three needs theory, these acquired needs significantly influence the behavior of an individual. The three main driving motivators are the needs for achievement, affiliation, and power.

  • The Valence Model of Leadership

    The Valence Model of Leadership

    The valence model of emergent leadership is based on a group-development sequence. As per the valence model, the process of emergent leadership passes through three distinct stages; Orientation, Conflict, and Emergence. Group members willingly start following and obeying the leader who has passed the "emergence threshold."

  • Motivation-Hygiene Theory

    Motivation-Hygiene Theory

    The two-factor theory also known as Herzberg's motivation-hygiene theory and dual-factor theory. This motivator-hygiene theory states that certain factors cause job satisfaction whereas certain separate factors cause dissatisfaction in the workplace. An organization can adjust these factors to influence motivation. These factors are respectively termed as motivators and hygiene factors.

  • Social Identity Theory

    Social Identity Theory

    The social identity theory of leadership views leadership as a group process. Social identity is a person's sense of who they are based on their group membership. Social identity theory sets agendas and goals generated by social categorization, defines who we are based on processes associated with social identity, and motivates to conduct ourselves based on what followers think of the leader.

  • Phases of Team Development

    Phases of Team Development

    All the teams are dynamic in nature and they take time to come together, they form, develop, and grow in stages, over a period of time. Teams go through five progressive stages: Forming, Storming, Norming, Performing and Adjourning. In this article, we want to introduce you to these stages of team development and certain strategies that you can use to help the team grow and develop in each of these stages. 

  • Kolb Learning Cycle & Change

    Kolb Learning Cycle & Change

    David Kolb produced this popular model for learning in 1984. The model suggests four stages of learning which most learners go through in order to learn effectively. Leaming is itself a process of change. Something is added to our perception and prepared us for the next impression, which will change our understanding yet more, however minutely. The Kolb contribution is a significant one because it practically equates change and learning.

Explore Our Free Training Articles or
Sign Up to Start With Our eLearning Courses

Subscribe to Our Newsletter


© 2023 TechnoFunc, All Rights Reserved