Role Theory of Leadership
Role theory is a concept in sociology and the role theory of leadership borrows these concepts to explain how people adapt to specific organizational and leadership roles. How the leaders and followers in an organizational context define their own roles, define the roles of others, how people act in their roles and how people expect people to act in their roles within the organization.
What is Role Theory?
Role Theory is a perspective in sociology and social psychology. Role Theory proposed that human behavior is guided by expectations held both by the individual and by other people. The expectations correspond to different roles individuals perform or enact in their daily lives, such as secretary, father, or friend. The model is based on the observation that people behave in a predictable way, and that an individual’s behavior is context specific, based on social position and other factors. Each social role is a set of rights, duties, expectations, norms and behaviors that a person has to face and fulfill. Roles are occupied by individuals, who are called "actors".
Role Theory of Leadership:
Role theory as it relates to organizational leadership is how the leaders and followers in an organizational context define their own roles, define the roles of others, how people act in their roles and how people expect people to act in their roles within the organization. The basic assumptions is that the leaders often define their own roles within an organization based on the how the employees see the leader’s role. This theory is based on the assumptions from social role theory that people define roles for themselves and others based on social learning and reading and they form expectations about the roles that they and others will play. People also encourage others within their social circle to act within the role expectations they have for them and they themselves try to act within the roles they adopt.
How it Works?
Associated with every work environment is a set of activities or roles that are defined as potential behaviors to be performed in accordance with a specific job. Within organizations, there exist both formal and informal channels to convey these expectations about leader's role. Formal role theory reveals itself through policies and positions set by upper management. Examples of formal channels are leadership values training, explicit leadership behaviors at different levels/bands, organizational culture, training sessions, mentoring by senior managers, and so on.
Informal role theory reveals itself through the expectations of followers. Employees have internal representations about the role of leaders, based on what they read, discuss, hear, observe and so on. They consciously or unconsciously send these expectations to their leaders, acting as role senders, for example forwarding an important customer escalation mail to the manager for decision and guidance in-spite of employee knowing the desired actions to resolve the same. This balancing of decisions employees take upon ourselves and the ones that they leave on their leaders pass these subtle expectations to the leader. Leaders get influenced by these signals, and will generally adapt and follow these, playing the leadership role that is put upon them by their followers.
Role Theory Terms:
Role expectations of a leader can vary from very specific to a broad idea within which the leader can define their own style. Given below are definitions of some common terms used in context of Role Theory of Leadership.
Role Set refers to any feature of the organization that is able to send role expectations/requirements and role pressures to the manager.
Role expectations refer to the degree to which all members of the manager's role set develop beliefs and attitudes about what the manager should and should not do as part of his/her role.
Sent role refers to the fact that role expectations are sent to the focal person (e.g., manager).
Role pressures refer to the numerous influence attempts directed at the focal person that make up the process of role sending.
Role forces are regarded as psychological forces of some magnitude and direction that result from sent pressures by role senders and are the immediate source of the manager's motivation to behave.
Role behavior is a system relevant behavior that is performed by one who is an accepted member of the system, and whose behavior is reinforced by the formalities of the organization.
Role Conflicts: According to role theory, role conflict is a possible experience for leaders within a business or organization. When the employees in a business have a set of expectations on the role of the leaders that are different from what the leaders accept as their role, role conflict can occur. Role conflict can also occur when different people have differing expectations of their leaders. It also happens when leaders have different ideas about what they should be doing compared to the expectations of followers or management. Similarly role conflict can also occur when a leader feels they should be performing a certain role but employees expect the leader to fill a different role.
Related Links
You May Also Like
-
David Kolb produced this popular model for learning in 1984. The model suggests four stages of learning which most learners go through in order to learn effectively. Leaming is itself a process of change. Something is added to our perception and prepared us for the next impression, which will change our understanding yet more, however minutely. The Kolb contribution is a significant one because it practically equates change and learning.
-
Social learning theory is a theory of learning process that states that most human behavior is learned observationally through modeling. Behavior change can occur in response to leader modeling and learning occurs through the observation of rewards and punishments. The focus of this approach has been teaching leadership across formal and informal settings.
-
In the field of communication studies, there are numerous models. No one model is suitable for all purposes and all levels of analysis. Some common models are known as Lasswell Model, George Gerbner Model, David Berlo Model, Shanon and Weaver Model, Osgoods Model, and Schramm Model. All these describe the four components of the communication process, namely, the source (communicator), the message, the channel, the receiver (audience).
-
Symbolic Interaction and Social Change
George Herbert Mead, an American philosopher, affiliated with the University of Chicago founded the theory of symbolic interactionism. A major aspect of this is that people interact by symbols both verbal and non-verbal signals and every interaction makes a contribution to the mental make-up of the mind thus every interaction with someone, changes you and you go away a different person signifying that humans and change go together.
-
Power is the ability to exercise influence or control over others. Leadership involves authority and it is very important for leaders to understand what type of power they're using. The 5 Types of Power in Leadership are Coercive power, expert power, legitimate power, referent power, and reward power. Authority is the right to command and extract obedience from others. It comes from the organization and it allows the leader to use power.
-
Burns Transformational Leadership Theory
Transformational leadership theory has been defined by James MacGregor Burns as a process where both leaders and followers mutually raise one another to higher levels of morality and motivation. The concept of transforming leader works with teams to garner trust, respect, and admiration while reaching to higher moral positions. The transformational theory of leadership was developed while studying political leaders and how they use charismatic methods to attract people to the values.
-
Have you ever resonated that there seem to be as many different ways to lead people as there have been great leaders? When we recall the success of Mahatma Gandhi, Nelson Mandela, Abraham Lincoln, Napoleon Bonaparte to Steve Jobs and Jack Welch, we also notice that they all used different approaches that were suitable to their specific situations and circumstances. Over the last century, researchers and psychologists have developed simple ways to describe the “Styles of leadership” and in this section, we will explore these commonly known leadership styles.
-
Communication has as its central objective the transmission of meaning. The process of communication is successful only when the receiver understands an idea as the sender intended it. How does a message or an idea travel from one person to another? To transmit our message, we engage in a sensitive and complex process of communication, with different elements like sender, message, channels, receiver, noise, and feedback.
-
Self-Fulfilling Prophecy (SFP) Leader Theory
Pygmalion theory of Leadership is a model of SFP at work involving supervisory expectancy based on the pygmalion effect. This effect is a type of self-fulfilling prophecy (SFP) in which raising leader's expectations regarding subordinate performance boosts the group's performance. Managers who are led to demand more from their team, lead the team to better performance. There is some evidence that the SFP effect does exists.
-
The psychodynamic approach to leadership has its roots in the work done by Sigmund Freud. These involved psychological theories of personality development and explaining leadership using psychoanalytic concepts. It tries to define a person is in terms of personality traits. Personality structured into three parts (i.e., tripartite) - the id, ego, and superego.
